Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Scott v. State

Scott v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 16, 2005 · Farmer, Gross, Shahood
913 So. 2d 1269; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18007; 2005 WL 3051128 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Scott v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979); Prince v. State, 885 So.2d 967, 968 (Fla. 4th D.CA 2004) (“Absent an express reservation of the right to appeal, a defendant may not appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a nolo con-tendere plea.”).

However, we remand the case to the trial court with directions for it to re-enter, nunc pro tunc, the judgment and mitigated sentences it entered on December 3, 2004, after the appellant’s filing of his notice of appeal had divested the trial, court of jurisdiction.

FARMER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur. ■

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.