Flores v. State
Flores v. State
915 So. 2d 706; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18658; 2005 WL 3143451
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Flores v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005.)
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.