Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2005

Betancourt v. Crosby

Betancourt v. Crosby
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 21, 2005 · Barfield, Browning, Wolf
917 So. 2d 307; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20025; 2005 WL 3479833 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Betancourt v. Crosby

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s “Motion to Stay Appeal Proceedings,” which the Court treats as a response to its order of October 14, 2005, the Court has determined that the “Order Denying Relief from Order” is not an appealable order. See Bennett’s Leasing, Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp., 870 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); see also Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.