Nwangwu v. State
Nwangwu v. State
919 So. 2d 488; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18416; 2005 WL 3095746
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Nwangwu v. State
Opinion of the Court
Because it appears that petitioner is represented by appointed counsel in the lower tribunal, the pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2003). Even overlooking this defect, however, we conclude that the petition is legally insufficient to demonstrate an entitlement to .habeas corpus relief.
PETITION DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.