Curls v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Leonardo Lynch v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Students for Online Voting v. STUDENT GOVERNMENT OF STUDENT BODY OF UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
- Students for Online Voting v. Student Government of the Student Body (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
- Rogers v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
David CURLS, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
David Curls, pro se, Appellant.
James V. Antista, General Counsel, and Charles Shelfer, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of June 2, 2006, the Court has determined that, because the administrative order on appeal, titled "Notice of Final Order," entered on September 22, 2005, has not been filed with the agency clerk, it has not been rendered. See Hill v. Div. of Ret., 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant's right to file a timely appeal from this order once it has been rendered.
KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD, and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.