Breitberg v. State
Breitberg v. State
942 So. 2d 439; 2006 WL 3020086
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Breitberg v. State
Opinion
Murray BREITBERG, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Murray Breitberg, Belle Glade, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dragon v. State, 937 So.2d 781 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Saintelien v. State, 937 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Brown v. State, 927 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in the above-cited cases, we again certify conflict with King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), and Kidd v. State, 855 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
WARNER, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.