McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
930 So. 2d 846; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698; 2006 WL 1628033
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McCarty v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
Opinion
Benjamin A. McCARTY, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and Samsonite Co. Stores, Inc., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Benjamin A. McCarty, in proper person.
John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.
Before WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
No error has been demonstrated in the ruling of the appeals referee as affirmed by the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, that the appellant was disqualified from benefits because of misconduct for repeated absences and tardiness. See Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co., 758 So.2d 649 (Fla. 2000); Sanchez v. Dep't of Labor & Employment Sec., 411 So.2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.