Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Perry v. State

Perry v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 3, 2006 · Per Curiam
927 So. 2d 228; 2006 WL 1152674 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Perry v. State

Opinion

927 So.2d 228 (2006)

Frank L. PERRY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D05-3344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2006.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A simple "hearsay" objection fails to preserve the argument that one's Sixth Amendment confrontation right has been violated. See Mencos v. State, 909 So.2d 349, 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ("The right of confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment `differs from the kind of protection that is afforded by state evidence rules governing the admission of hearsay.'" (quoting Lopez v. State, 888 So.2d 693, 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004))).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.