Favata v. State
Favata v. State
917 So. 2d 1012; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 31; 2006 WL 20492
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Favata v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed. To the extent that the appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, we decline to address the propriety of that denial because the record fails to contain a signed, written order disposing of the appellant’s motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.