Steele v. Crosby
Steele v. Crosby
919 So. 2d 566; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 91; 2006 WL 42241
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Steele v. Crosby
Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of November 16, 2005, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Frantz v. Moore, 772 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.