Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Brifiel v. State

Brifiel v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 22, 2006 · Hazouri, Polen, Warner
920 So. 2d 1224; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2252; 2006 WL 398519 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Brifiel v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motions for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, because they were impermissibly filed beyond the two-year time limitation. However, as it appears the trial court has never ruled on appellant’s supplemental motion filed March 16, 2004, our affir-mance is without prejudice to obtaining a ruling on the supplemental motion.

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.