Austin v. Crosby

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Austin v. Crosby, 921 So. 2d 737 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971; 2006 WL 354306
Barfield, Browning, Wolf

Austin v. Crosby

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 6, 2006, the Court has determined that the lower tribunal’s October 27, 2005, order is not an appealable order. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the dismissal, the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, and the appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time, are hereby denied as moot.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Henry AUSTIN v. James V. CROSBY, Jr.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published