Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Woolbright v. Florida Parole Commission

Woolbright v. Florida Parole Commission
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 3, 2006 · Allen, Browning, Padovano
922 So. 2d 1039; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2886; 2006 WL 504057 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Woolbright v. Florida Parole Commission

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, challenging the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus, has not met his burden to show that the trial court failed to afford due process and departed from the essential requirements of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1998); Tedder v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 842 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

ALLEN, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.