Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Saldane v. State

Saldane v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 15, 2006 · Cope, Suarez, Wells
923 So. 2d 1198; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3555; 2006 WL 626093 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Saldane v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellant contends that he does not qualify as a habitual offender. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2001). On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse *1199the order and remand for further proceedings or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.