Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Bowman v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 23, 2006 · Barfield, Benton, Webster

923 So. 2d 1235; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4180; 2006 WL 722169 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco v. Ward (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that a valid and enforceable settlement agreement existed. Accordingly, we affirm as to that issue. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction appellant’s challenge to the award of attorney’s fees because the order reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. Accordingly, that portion of the order is nonfinal and nonappealable. See, e.g., Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.