Brown v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Brown v. State, 924 So. 2d 37 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 814; 2006 WL 181394
Kahn, Padovano, Thomas

Brown v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has issued a recent order granting petitioner leave to amend his motion for post-conviction relief, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is not warranted. See Munn v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 738 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim after petitioner has amended his motion.

KAHN, C.J., PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lashawn D. BROWN v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published