T.J.M. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal
T.J.M. v. State, 925 So. 2d 440 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047; 2006 WL 888153
Lawson, Orfinger, Sawaya
T.J.M. v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Jenkins v. State, 872 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (To prevail on a motion to continue based upon witness unavailability, the moving party must show: (1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness’ presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would be forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- T.J.M., Jr., A Child v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published