T.J.M. v. State
T.J.M. v. State
925 So. 2d 440; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047; 2006 WL 888153
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
T.J.M. v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Jenkins v. State, 872 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (To prevail on a motion to continue based upon witness unavailability, the moving party must show: (1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness’ presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would be forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.