T.J.M. v. State
T.J.M. v. State
925 So. 2d 440; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047; 2006 WL 888153
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bernard Cheremont v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
- Walters v. Ocean Gate Phase I Condominium (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Jenkins v. State, 872 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (To prevail on a motion to continue based upon witness unavailability, the moving party must show: (1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness’ presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would be forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.