T.J.M. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
T.J.M. v. State, 925 So. 2d 440 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047; 2006 WL 888153
Lawson, Orfinger, Sawaya

T.J.M. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Jenkins v. State, 872 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (To prevail on a motion to continue based upon witness unavailability, the moving party must show: (1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness’ presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would be forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.).

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
T.J.M., Jr., A Child v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published