Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Cosby v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 13, 2006 · No. 5D06-32 · Lawson, Sharp, Thompson

925 So. 2d 1130; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5457; 2006 WL 941820 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Milliken v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The denial of the defendant, William D. Cosby’s Rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed. The defendant has filed twenty (20) appeals and petitions in this court relating to his convictions and sentences in Orange County, Circuit Court Case Numbers 2001-CF-14134, 2002-CF-2531, 2002-CF-3454, and 2002-CF-6421. He was ordered to show cause why he should not be denied further access to this court for any proceedings to further attack those convictions and sentences. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

The court has carefully reviewed the defendant’s response to the court’s order and finds no merit thereto. Accordingly, in order to preserve judicial resources, the defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings, motions, petitions or *1131other filings in this court relating to Orange County Circuit Court, Case Numbers 2001-CF-14134, 2002-CF-2531, 2002-CF-3454, and 2002-CF-6421. Any further proceedings filed in this court relating to the defendant’s convictions and sentences in these cases must be reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of The Florida Bar. The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed to not accept any further pro se pleadings from the defendant, William D. Cosby, in the above-styled cases.

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.