Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Gruenwald v. State

Gruenwald v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 11, 2006 · Ervin, Hawkes, Padovano
926 So. 2d 439; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5290; 2006 WL 908450 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Gruenwald v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the record did not reveal reversible error, we affirm. However, we remand for removal of the theft enhancements from Appellant’s judgment. Gruenwald v. State, 899 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Because correction of this scrivener’s error is simply a ministerial act, Appellant’s presence is not required. The trial court’s order is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

ERVIN, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.