Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Beasley v. State

Beasley v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 4, 2006 · Benton, Kahn, Wolf
927 So. 2d 1026; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6691; 2006 WL 1168689 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Beasley v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See King v. State, 628 So.2d 486, 488 (Fla. 1993); Taylor v. State, 640 So.2d 1127, 1133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (“Improper prosecutorial comment is subject to a harmless error analysis, and will give rise to reversal of a conviction only if the comment is so prejudicial that it vitiates the entire trial.”). See also Proctor v. State, 901 So.2d 994, 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“[Tjhis court would not be able to address the [scrivener’s] errors because, absent the trial court’s ruling on a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, these errors were not preserved. See Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla. 2003).”).

KAHN, C.J., WOLF, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.