Flowers v. State
Flowers v. State
929 So. 2d 617; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7045; 2006 WL 1235958
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Flowers v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Kalvin Flowers, argues in his appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to the police officer’s opinion as to his guilt and in allowing prosecutorial misconduct.
We affirm his conviction on the charges of burglary with damages over $1,000 and grand theft, without prejudice to his right to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claims in a post-conviction motion. See Bradberry v. State, 922 So.2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.