Tunsil v. State
Tunsil v. State
929 So. 2d 665; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7749; 2006 WL 1330027
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Tunsil v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (confirming that infirmity in notice of intent to seek enhanced sentence must be raised in a timely Rule 3.850 motion); Tunsil v. State, 797 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(re-manding for resentencing as expressly ordered and stating “[defendant need not be present” for same).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.