Tunsil v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Tunsil v. State, 929 So. 2d 665 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7749; 2006 WL 1330027
Cortinas, Rothenberg, Wells

Tunsil v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (confirming that infirmity in notice of intent to seek enhanced sentence must be raised in a timely Rule 3.850 motion); Tunsil v. State, 797 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(re-manding for resentencing as expressly ordered and stating “[defendant need not be present” for same).

Reference

Full Case Name
Douglas TUNSIL, III v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published