Brown v. State
Brown v. State
929 So. 2d 684; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7874; 2006 WL 1360081
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Brown v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm Antwan Brown’s appeal of his judgment and sentence entered after he pleaded guilty. We do so without prejudice for him to file a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) when the mandate in this case has issued and jurisdiction has returned to the circuit court. Any motion should not be deemed successive based upon the circuit court’s denial of Brown’s pro se motion to correct illegal sentence. See Schrader v. State, 890 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that a circuit court did not have jurisdiction to rule on a defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion filed during the pendency of his direct appeal).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.