Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Floyd v. State

Floyd v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 7, 2006 · Shahood, Stevenson
929 So. 2d 1191; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961; 2006 WL 1541085 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Floyd v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Myshion Floyd’s appeal on the charge of battery on a law enforcement officer. We remand, however, to the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment form entered by the trial court shows an “X” marking the option that Floyd “Entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes,” and then lists the offense of battery on a law enforcement officer. However, the record shows that Floyd actually entered a written plea of not guilty, and was subsequently found guilty by jury trial. Appellant need not be present to correct this error.

Affirmed; Remanded.

STEVENSON, C.J., SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.