Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Shabazz v. State

Shabazz v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 31, 2006 · Benton, Polston, Thomas
930 So. 2d 796; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8703; 2006 WL 1468353 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Shabazz v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant directly challenges his sentence to three consecutive life terms arising out of his conviction on three counts of attempted first-degree murder. Appellant has not preserved this issue for direct appeal. “The failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3.800(b) or by objection during the sentencing hearing forecloses [a defendant] from raising the error on direct appeal.” Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla. 2003). Therefore, Appellant’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

BENTON, POLSTON and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.