Shabazz v. State
Shabazz v. State
930 So. 2d 796; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8703; 2006 WL 1468353
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Shabazz v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant directly challenges his sentence to three consecutive life terms arising out of his conviction on three counts of attempted first-degree murder. Appellant has not preserved this issue for direct appeal. “The failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3.800(b) or by objection during the sentencing hearing forecloses [a defendant] from raising the error on direct appeal.” Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla. 2003). Therefore, Appellant’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.