Ciesla v. State
Ciesla v. State
931 So. 2d 86; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 438; 2006 WL 1026955
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ciesla v. State
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied because his claims are moot in light of his acquittal on Count II.
DENIED.
WEBSTER and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.