Bautz v. State
Bautz v. State
932 So. 2d 465; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578; 2006 WL 1470130
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Eason v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.