Bautz v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Bautz v. State, 932 So. 2d 465 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578; 2006 WL 1470130
Gross, Shahood
Bautz v. State
Opinion of the Court
The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jeromy BAUTZ v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published