Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Bautz v. State

Bautz v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 31, 2006 · Gross, Shahood
932 So. 2d 465; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578; 2006 WL 1470130 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bautz v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.