Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 16, 2006 · Salcines, Silberman, Stringer

932 So. 2d 1150; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012; 2006 WL 1667394 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Browning v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Douglas M. Wyckoff appeals the trial court’s order rendered March 11, 2005, arguing that the court erred in resolving several postdissolution issues. He also argues that in light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928 (Fla. 2005), this court should *1151vacate or modify our earlier decision in Wyckoff v. Wyckoff 820 So.2d 350 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). We affirm in all respects but note that the substantial change test approved in Wade would apply to further child custody modification proceedings between the parties.

Affirmed.

SALCINES, STRINGER, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.