Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Hasemeier v. McDonough

Hasemeier v. McDonough
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 29, 2006 · Padovano, Polston, Wolf
932 So. 2d 1168; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730; 2006 WL 1763658 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hasemeier v. McDonough

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of May 23, 2006, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is renewable by motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.430 in the appellate proceeding that precipitated the order rather than by separate appeal. Wagner v. McDonough, 930 So.2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The circuit court’s appellate indigen-cy/lien order is properly challenged by filing a motion for review in case number 1D05-3856.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.