Erickson v. Erickson
Erickson v. Erickson
932 So. 2d 1240; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11489; 2006 WL 1888572
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Erickson v. Erickson
Opinion of the Court
Appellant seeks review of an Order on Writ of Civil Attachment. Because the trial court’s finding that appellant had the ability to pay the purge amount set is not supported by competent substantial evidence, we are constrained to reverse. See, e.g., Stebbins v. Stebbins, 754 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Perez v. Perez, 599 So.2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
REVERSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.