Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Koenig v. Theofilos

Koenig v. Theofilos
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 2, 2006 · Klein, Shahood, Taylor
933 So. 2d 1293; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12841; 2006 WL 2135856 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Koenig v. Theofilos

Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, J.

Appellant Koenig, a lawyer, represented a client in a personal injury case, and signed a letter agreeing to pay the medical bills rendered by Dr. Theofilos out of the proceeds of any recovery. When Koenig obtained a recovery for the client, he took his fees and paid the balance to the client without paying Dr. Theofilos. Koenig argues that the trial court should not have granted Dr. Theofilos’s motion for summary judgment in this suit against Koenig because Dr. Theofilos ultimately was unable to connect the client’s brain injury which he diagnosed to the accident.

The letter of protection signed by the client and Koenig provides in part:

I hereby authorize and direct my attorney to pay directly to Charles S. Theofi-los, MD, PA, all sums due and owing for all services rendered by Charles S. Theofilos, MD, PA, or any balance thereof, including but not limited to the medical services rendered, reports made or duplicated, depositions given, or time spent as an expert witness in this case.

Koenig’s argument that payment of the medical bills was contingent on connecting the client’s brain injury to the accident is contrary to the clear terms of the letter. The other arguments he raises are also without merit. We accordingly affirm.

SHAHOOD and' TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.