Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Skipwith v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 31, 2006 · Klein, Polen, Shahood

934 So. 2d 544; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8560; 2006 WL 1476127 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

On Motion foe ClaRification

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for clarification is hereby granted, and we clarify that this court’s per curiam affirmance of this case is without prejudice to appellant’s raising his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.