Skipwith v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Skipwith v. State, 934 So. 2d 544 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8560; 2006 WL 1476127
Klein, Polen, Shahood

Skipwith v. State

Opinion of the Court

On Motion foe ClaRification

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for clarification is hereby granted, and we clarify that this court’s per curiam affirmance of this case is without prejudice to appellant’s raising his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael SKIPWITH v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published