Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

State v. Seitz

State v. Seitz
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 14, 2006 · Green, Levy, Shepherd
935 So. 2d 541; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9423; 2006 WL 1627515 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Seitz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The undisputed testimony of the defendant is that he would not have entered into his plea agreement if it were not for the misadvice he received from his trial counsel. Accordingly, the motion for relief filed by the defendant, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, should have been granted. The cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of having the trial court grant said motion. The foregoing renders the appeal by the State moot.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.