Kong v. State
Kong v. State
935 So. 2d 1278; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14026; 2006 WL 2418969
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the denial of Kong’s rule 3.800(a) motion, without prejudice to the filing of a timely and legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion addressing the claims imper-missibly raised for the first time on appeal in his initial brief.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.