Miller v. State
Miller v. State
936 So. 2d 729; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13714; 2006 WL 2366401
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Miller v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the orders revoking Appellant’s concurrent terms of probation. The curfew and weekly reporting requirement were imposed as conditions of release following Appellant’s arrest for alleged probation violations that were subsequently dismissed. Because the curfew and weekly reporting requirement were not conditions of probation, the violation of those conditions may not serve as a basis for probation revocation. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reinstatement of the concurrent terms of probation.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.