Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Miller v. State

Miller v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 17, 2006 · Davis, Hawkes, Polston
936 So. 2d 729; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13714; 2006 WL 2366401 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Miller v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the orders revoking Appellant’s concurrent terms of probation. The curfew and weekly reporting requirement were imposed as conditions of release following Appellant’s arrest for alleged probation violations that were subsequently dismissed. Because the curfew and weekly reporting requirement were not conditions of probation, the violation of those conditions may not serve as a basis for probation revocation. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reinstatement of the concurrent terms of probation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.