Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

M.D.J. v. State

M.D.J. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 1, 2006 · Orfinger, Sawaya, Torpy
936 So. 2d 774; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14620 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
M.D.J. v. State

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We strike the assessment of the fine set forth in section 939.185, Florida Statutes (2005), as it has no application in juvenile proceedings. See V.K.E. v. State, 934 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). We affirm the trial court’s order denying suppression of M.D.J.’s statement to law enforcement as we agree that M.D.J. was not the subject of a custodial interrogation.

AFFIRMED; FINE STRICKEN.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.