Hebert v. State
Hebert v. State
937 So. 2d 215; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14680; 2006 WL 2520686
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hebert v. State
Opinion of the Court
Mark Hebert appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of an occupied dwelling and third degree grand theft. Appointed counsel has filed a memorandum brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We conclude that the Anders proceeding is appropriate and grant appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw. The defendant has failed to raise any meritorious points in his pro se brief, and accordingly, we affirm his convictions and sentences.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.