Pernell v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Pernell v. State, 937 So. 2d 234 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14646; 2006 WL 2521280
Gersten, Green, Suarez

Pernell v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for post conviction relief claiming newly discovered evidence. We affirm because the defendant’s claim regarding gain time has been previously litigated, Pernell v. State, 855 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), is untimely, and does not qualify as newly discovered evidence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1997).

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Curtis Kendall PERNELL v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published