Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Pernell v. State

Pernell v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 1, 2006 · Gersten, Green, Suarez
937 So. 2d 234; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14646; 2006 WL 2521280 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pernell v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for post conviction relief claiming newly discovered evidence. We affirm because the defendant’s claim regarding gain time has been previously litigated, Pernell v. State, 855 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), is untimely, and does not qualify as newly discovered evidence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1997).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.