Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

K.J.S. v. State

K.J.S. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 5, 2006 · Ervin, Hawkes, Webster
937 So. 2d 1174; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14828; 2006 WL 2527248 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

K.J.S. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation as amply supported by the record. The remaining issues raised by appellant, includ*1175ing those related to assessment of costs, fees and surcharges, were unpreserved by either a timely objection or a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b)(2) and do not implicate fundamental error. Accordingly, we may not consider them. See generally A.M.P. v. State, 927 So.2d 97 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑