Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Rizzotto v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 4, 2006 · Farmer, Polen, Shahood

938 So. 2d 619; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16429; 2006 WL 2818772 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Joseph v. Chanin (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, but remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation. The order provided correctly states that appellant was found to have violated condition 11; however, condition 11 was that appellant have no contact with her father at his residence. The order provided states that appellant violated condition 11 by changing her residence without first procuring the consent of her probation officer.

POLEN, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.