Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Cargile v. State

Cargile v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 29, 2006 · Casanueva, Stringer, Villanti
939 So. 2d 166; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16359; 2006 WL 2787532 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cargile v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to whatever right Mr. Cargile may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. See Hitchcock v. State, 866 So.2d 23 (Fla. 2004).

CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑