Taylor v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Taylor v. State, 939 So. 2d 1158 (2006)
2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17512; 2006 WL 2987115
Casanueva, Stringer, Wallace

Taylor v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Sheldon K. Taylor challenges the denial of his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the postconviction court’s order because Taylor’s motion is facially insufficient. See Gilbert v. State, 805 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Colosimo v. State, 775 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Taylor’s right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sheldon K. TAYLOR v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published