Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Taylor v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 20, 2006 · Casanueva, Stringer, Wallace

939 So. 2d 1158; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17512; 2006 WL 2987115 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Budd v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Sheldon K. Taylor challenges the denial of his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the postconviction court’s order because Taylor’s motion is facially insufficient. See Gilbert v. State, 805 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Colosimo v. State, 775 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Taylor’s right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.