Taylor v. State
Taylor v. State
939 So. 2d 1158; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17512; 2006 WL 2987115
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Taylor v. State
Opinion of the Court
Sheldon K. Taylor challenges the denial of his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the postconviction court’s order because Taylor’s motion is facially insufficient. See Gilbert v. State, 805 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Colosimo v. State, 775 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Taylor’s right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.