Roeser v. Roeser
Roeser v. Roeser
940 So. 2d 606; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18341; 2006 WL 3077706
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the final order in all respects except that we remand for modification to reflect the oral pronouncement of the court that the $25,000 awarded Appellant be spent for the child’s welfare in addition to education, an apparent scrivenor’s error.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.