Martin v. State
Martin v. State
941 So. 2d 1173; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16589; 2006 WL 2844438
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Martin v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850 because the motion was brought more than two years after appellant’s judgment and sentence became final. The filing of an unsuccessful petition for belated appeal does not toll the rendition of a judgment and sentence for purposes of calculating the two-year window. See Jones v. State, 922 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.