Hood v. Union Planters Bank
Hood v. Union Planters Bank
941 So. 2d 1175; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17226; 2006 WL 2955937
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hood v. Union Planters Bank
Opinion of the Court
We dismiss the instant appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant Anthony Hood has no standing to appeal this foreclosure because he was not one of the parties named below, and made no effort to intervene. See, e.g., Stas v. Posada, 760 So.2d 954, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Appellant Roxie Hood has not filed any documents associated with this appeal and, in fact, never filed a notice of appeal in this case. Because Anthony Hood cannot bring this appeal, and Roxie Hood has not actually appealed, we hereby dismiss the entire appeal.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.