Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Hampton v. State

Hampton v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 8, 2006 · Klein, Taylor
941 So. 2d 1198; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18589; 2006 WL 3207934 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hampton v. State

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s filing a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion alleging, if he can, that he does not actually qualify for sentencing as a habitual felony offender or as a prison releasee reoffender. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 n. 5 (Fla. 2001); Adlington v. State, 840 So.2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 859 So.2d 513 (Fla. 2003); Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694, 695-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

KLEIN, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.