Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2006

Centano v. State

Centano v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 20, 2006 · Rothenberg, Suarez, Wells
944 So. 2d 1225; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21273; 2006 WL 3734378 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Centano v. State

Opinion of the Court

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

Teofilo B. Centano (“defendant”) appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), as repetitious. As the order provided by the defendant contains no attachments, we are unable to provide meaningful review. We, therefore, reverse and remand for the issuance of a new order with the record attachments that conclusively refute the defendant’s claims, if the motion is denied. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D)(requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.