Hicks v. Hicks
Hicks v. Hicks
962 So. 2d 975; 2007 WL 2140591
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hicks v. Hicks
Opinion
Lori HICKS, Appellant,
v.
Charles HICKS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
William H. Drumm, of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen Ginsburg, P.A. Sarasota, for Appellant.
Scott Gediman, of Gediman, Duffy Gediman P.C., Everett, MA, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's order enforcing the parties' prenuptial and marital settlement agreements was supported by competent, substantial evidence. An appellate court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence. Okoh v. Okoh, 918 So.2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, LAWSON, EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.