Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Sullivan v. State

Sullivan v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 5, 2007 · Per Curiam
972 So. 2d 918; 2007 WL 4270620 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Sullivan v. State

Opinion

972 So.2d 918 (2007)

Willie SULLIVAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D06-5546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 5, 2007.

James. Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Steven L. Bolotin, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Willie Sullivan challenges the trial court's decision allowing the State to have initial and rebuttal closing arguments in accordance with section 918.19, Florida Statutes (2006), and argues that section 918.19 is unconstitutional. We affirm based on the reasoning in Grice v. State, 967 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2007).

Affirmed.

WALLACE and LaROSE, JJ., and LOGAN, PAUL E., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.