Bailey v. State
Bailey v. State
954 So. 2d 1264; 2007 WL 1223444
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bailey v. State
Opinion
Ricardo BAILEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Meghan Ann Collins, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We agree that the trial court improperly sustained certain hearsay objections. However, such errors were harmless because the witness was later able to testify to those matters which had initially been wrongfully excluded. Wallace v. State, 766 So.2d 364, 371-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); see also Turner v. State, 809 So.2d 59, 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.